Dreaming is Free

Press play, then start reading.

When I was asked to keynote the Fleming College Fall Teaching & Learning Day, I thought it’d be a great chance to heed some advice from Blondie (Dreaming is free, after all) and drop a bunch of ideas for digital learning initiatives that we could do and see which ones that we can breath some life into. Each of these ideas are inspired by some open, networked and/or connectivist learning experiences that are already out there. This is an invitation for all of us to dream together about what we can do, so the talk came with a survey that gives you the chance to add your name to any initiative you’d like and your thoughts to the list. That way I can follow up with you and get you on board. So, let’s get digital (here are the slides) and take a look at these wild ideas:

Okay this is one I really have to do as part of the job of Digital Learning Advisor. It’s right there in the Strategic Plan to create a learning technology inventory for Fleming College. But why should I have all the fun? If we do it using something like the Ontario Extend Activity Bank, we could not only have an inventory of the tools we have, we could also have a curation of the tools we actually use, whether they are the tools we pay for or ones available on that Internet thing. Whether they are in-class hardware or online software. With the bank, sure I’ll be the main person adding to and moderating the inventory, but others can as well. Each piece of tech can have its own page full of use cases, examples, tutorials, suggestions of who to seek out for help, and comments. It can be a living thing that builds community and increases access to things rather than a lonely spreadsheet or database that gets a few clicks here and there.

I think this one is going to be great. I’d like to create a team of student workers to help students get more familiar with their digital ecosystems, to go a little deeper with digital assignments, or to push students towards a little bit more critical thought in their working with digital tools. It’s being done already at Muhlenberg College. What they do is summed up nicely by one of their DLAs: “We are a group of students who are trained in a bunch of different digital learning tools so we can help students who are using those tools in their classes.” Simple, but oh so awesome.

I’d also like to have kind of a mirror image program for faculty. A couple of Digital Learning Allies from each school. A pay it forward situation in which they receive deeper training in some of the same digital tools for their own teaching, with the caveat that they are swoofed a little time to get the training and to pay it forward to other faculty in their schools. I’ve done some initial chats and am drumming up some interest already.

Ontario Extend is a set of open educational resources designed to empower educators to effectively use technology in their design and delivery of learning environments. It also happens to come with a lovely community of Ontario educators who love to connect and share their work. I think Fleming would greatly benefit from having a group of educators not just complete the modules, but also to tap in to this community. I propose we run a cohort through all 6 modules concurrently with one person facilitating each module. You can choose your own path, you can take your time, you can have all the help you need. And there are badges!

The Extend framework could just use a little nudge and a tweak and become something very useful for empowering students to learn with technology. The originals are all openly licensed so we could go right ahead and remix and revise them thangs and make a great little set of modules for empowering students to centre themselves in their own learning through technology. I do believe credit for this idea goes to one Lena Patterson at eCampusOntario. Thanks, Lena!

This can maybe be some of the work of the Digital Learning Allies. A space similar to the learning technology bank but not for tools so much as for using tools to make cool and engaging alternative assignments like course trailers, podcasts, visual syllabi, course posters, Twine games and more! Like the technology bank, each post can have tutorials, examples, use cases and more. This can serve as inspiration to any faculty as they go to design new assignments or redesign old ones, with a look to making student work more enduring, less disposable. The work your students do can have more impact not just for themselves as showcase work, but also for you in your future courses.

I believe another piece of valuing the work that students do is to recognize smaller chunks of achievement, like they do in video games (achievement unlocked!). I think we can dabble in that with open badging as a form of micro-credentialing. We already do it with the Co-Curricular Record, so the badges could piggy back onto that, but it’d be fun to build a visual identity for recognizing work inside and outside of academic work that students can build off of and take with them.

It sounds funny, I know, but the more we help students to do their work and collaborate in authentic spaces, the more ready they will be to do work and collaborate in authentic spaces. The LMS is not one of those spaces. D2L will be a long lost or repressed memory shortly after leaving the academic world. More and more, work is being done in collaborative team spaces like Slack, Teams, and Discord. Actually it’s not necessarily so much the work itself, but the connecting and culture building of your work that happens in these spaces. Let’s help students live in these spaces and to help each other through their programs. And hey, let’s use them ourselves! I’ve set up a Fleming Team called Digital Learning at Fleming, where we can lean on each other for help with technology stuff. Join here if you are a Fleming staff and would like in.

Recently we gathered some folks to see what we think about a tool called ECHO 360, in response to some requests for a “lecture capture” solution. We had a couple of Academic chairs, faculty, IT, students and the LDS Team come to the demo. Before looking at the tool I was of the opinion that capturing lectures was maybe leaning a little too much into a passive way of trying to learn rather than a more engaged active learning experience. This tool, though, it seems to have a little something going on to make lectures a little more social, engaging and collaborative. We will be looking more into a pilot to try it more deeply, but the opportunity to provide a flexible and accessible option for delivering some of our content is there.

I spent the last two years working with eCampusOntario, who have been really big fans of OER. And so am I. Open Educational Resources are ones that are free to keep, to use, to revise, to remix. It starts with saving your students some money, and it gets better from there. But it’s not so easy to just switch to an OER let alone maybe make your won, or co-create with your students. So I propose as a start that we simply, with the help of the library, just check to see if there’s something out there for you and your students and go from there. Who knows, maybe you’ll get a standing ovation when you tell your students you saved them a bunch of moola.

In the world of Ed-Tech, it often seems like there’s something new every twelve seconds. It’s hard to keep up, and there’s a lot of crap tbh. However, sometimes new things seem awesome and actually add a new element to what we can do. My favorite new tools of the last couple years, ones that bring a social and collaborative element to digital learning, are H5P, Pressbooks, and Hypothes.is. What do design sprints have to do with this? I don’t know for sure but maybe if we got in to the practice of meeting to actually build some stuff out with this stuff rather than having a workshop about it, we might make a bigger push forward. Want to try?

We’ve been doing the Teaching Hub for a few years now. It’s a weekly blog post focused on doling out what’s going on, pedagogically, at Fleming in easy to digest chunks. We think it may be most beneficial to contract faculty who are not completely ensconced in Fleming all day every day, but we hope it’s beneficial to anyone teaching here. What can you do to be involved? Tell us about stuff you’d like to see in there! That would be great!

Through both The Open Faculty Patchbook & The Open Learner Patchbook, we have so far collected over sixty short pieces of writing, each by a different student or teacher, about how they do the things they do to make learning happen. We collect the stories from anywhere, and they have come from far and wide, but Fleming College is the epicentre. We’d love to have more from Fleming faculty and students. It could even be an assignment in one of your classes?

This is a bit of a different take on active learning, arguably the wrong take actually. But we’ve done it before and it was kind of fun, so why not do it again? Here’s the plan: we organize a set of public talks welcome to anyone, but the catch is it’s also a spin class, or aerobics or Zoomba or whatever it is that people enjoy doing that’s active. We record it and share it with the world. Get sweaty in bodies and minds! I think this would be a fun way to work to meet strategic goals #2, being a true partner with the community. Who would be up for sharing what you know with some spandex clad listeners?

I’m on the conference committee for the OER20 Conference in London and this is where I got this idea. They have the same virtual meeting room for each meeting, but they also leave it an open access thing so we can consider it a space to meet any time! Great idea! So I made one for us. Anyone at Fleming can use this webex room at anytime to meet each other to chat. Just share that URL with whoever you want to meet and poof! you’ll be in the same virtual room where you can share documents and non verbal language.

So there you have it. Some ideas for stuff to do. Want to get involved in any of them? Fill out the survey!

Photo by Christophe Hautier on Unsplash

Libretexts Chemistry in Moodle

The Stone Arch Bridge Initiative for Education Resources, SABIER, is pleased to announce the launch of a Chemistry course for K-12. This is a course that uses a chemistry text from Libretexts and  is housed in a Moodle course with homework quizzes created by Andrew Lyman-Butler. Andrew described the quizzes and his thinking in a Medium article:

“Considerable variation in assessment items between students and between attempts. Numeric questions make use of Moodle’s “calculated” question type, in which random numbers within set limits are generated for each question, and student responses are evaluated using a teacher-supplied formula and a margin of error. Further variation is incorporated by using an item bank with multiple variants of each question type, which are sampled at random every time a new assessment attempt is generated. Two students sitting next to each other will have completely different quizzes, and a student re-attempting a quiz will have it regenerated from scratch.”

 This course will be available for download from the SABIER Moodle site upon request. All components of the course are openly licensed so that teachers can modify any portion of the content or quizzes to meet the particular needs of their students. In addition to the quizzes that are aligned to each section of the content, there is a template for lab reports and a grading rubric for those reports. A forum will be available in each content section that allows each student to respond to a prompt and then reply to the posts of other students once they have made their posts. SABIER’s teacher professional development cohorts will explore various strategies for using both lab reports and forums. 

Please contact Dan McGuire (dan@sabier.org) to be included in the teacher professional development cohort and to receive instructions for downloading the Moodle course file. There are still slots available at no cost to teachers or their schools for the teacher professional development cohorts. Limited support is available to assist in importing the course into Canvas, Schoology, or D2L. We do not recommend using the course with Google Classroom except via a link to a free Moodle site. LTI functionality to LMSs other than Moodle will be available in 2020.

Storytelling

I returned to StoryCenter in Berkeley this week to participate in a Digital Storytelling workshop as a civilian.

I returned to community college as a non-traditional (adult) student after President Obama urged displaced workers to update their skills in his first State of the Union address. I had such a terrible experiance in Oakland’s Peralta Community College District I was forced to become a student leader. That led to being invited to a New Organizing Institute workshop to learn Harvard University’s Marshall Gans’ “Story of Self” method for political communication. Hey, it worked for Senator Barak Obama.

I then discovered the Digital Storytelling Center (now StoryCenter.org) in nearby Berkeley, California. I’ve been taking workshops for the past five years and have been trained as a DS Facilitator. I recently co-taught a Digital Storytelling workshop with Dr. Bryan Alexander at EDUCAUSE’s annual convention in Denver. I highly recommend his “New Digital Storytelling: Creating Narratives with New Media“. 

It was fun to just be a participant again. With the help of my fellow workshoppers in the story circle, and facilitators Rani and Andrea, for the first time I was able to edit an idea down to about three minutes and actually finish a story during a three day workshop. 

Please leave your comments below.

“Alas” and “Oh, well…” & what’s to come….

[736 words]

Despite my best intentions, I was unable to get very far this year on the OpenLearning CMOOC/faculty collaborative. As interesting as it was, the activities began at a time when I was already committed to a number of other high-priority projects and duties, especially 1. completing my work teaching an online course (with a few students who has “incomplete” grades and needed extra attention from me, and time time to complete their work), 2. taking an online course where a major assignment was due at the end of March, and 3. presenting multiple papers at the NeMLA 2019 conference (program available by clicking the following URL: http://www.buffalo.edu/content/dam/www/nemla/NeMLA%202019/NeMLA%202019%20Convention%20Program.pdf) in the Washington DC area. It was way to much for me to handle. So, of course, the first thing to go was the least pressing, even if the most interesting, Gardner Campbell’s CMOOC. (I know that it was not, strictly speaking, “Gardner Campbell’s” but that’s how I think of it, since he is one of the originators of the professional development CMOOC course on open learning and inviting collective reflection on technology.)

In spite of bailing out of the OpenLearning ’19 CMOOC, I continue to think about open learning, especially in the context of online education. What is more, I am as determined as ever to develop and run a free course on using target-language media resources in French to develop intercultural capability (or intercultural competence, if you prefer, or even intercultural communicative competence). Indeed, I think that this will be one of my major initiatives this year. I am also going to continue to explore openness as a general pedagogical concepts.

That does not change a certain skepticism that I have relative to “open learning” in certain forms. One of the things that irks me is the existence of “openlearning.com,” which looks a bit like a commercial vehicle for monetizing online teaching expertise by encouraging instructors develop independent courses that the site will host for a fee while hinting at the possibility of financial returns for the teacher. Of course, what they do not say is that designing a course, publicizing it in a way that is likely to attract significant student interest, running it a way that will do more than simply satisfy one’s customers, but also give them skills and/or knowledge of very high value, so high, in fact, that it will motivate them to publicize your course, and to do all of this in a way that is sustainable and feasible… is an almost impossibly difficult task for a single person to manage on her or his own. So the intimation that it can be profitable is, in my view, an exploitation of some folks’ naïveté. Teachers with what might be a good idea for a course pay good money to buy a subscription so that they can develop and host their course using the OpenLearning infrastructure, possibly in the hopes of making money… even though in most cases, individuals are likely to fail to create a commercial winner that is also academically excellent. This scheme, of course, makes money almost exclusively for OpenLearning.

Now, that said, I note that there are some institutions that seem to have invested significant and substantial resources in the develop of truly open learning resources, like Open University, MIT and Carnegie Mellon (their OpenCourseware and Open Learning Initiative sites) and, of course the big MOOCs (edX, Coursera, France Université Numérique/FUN, etc.). There are teachers, thinkers, pedagogues, leaders, and visionaries who are truly committed to the “Open” ethos and to CMOOCs and the like. So I’m not skeptical about everything. But when websites and Twitter-voices talk about Open, there is almost always some confusion about exactly what they mean. Open textbooks licensed through Creative Commons are one thing. Truly free open courses are something different. Disguised and seemingly free materials and courses are yet another kind of ostensibly “openness.” And folks are not always precise and forthcoming about which flavor or orientation of “Open” they mean.

So part of what I intend to do in coming weeks is to reflect on Open and different kinds of “openness.” I’ll critique the ideas and I’ll point toward those dimensions and implementations that I think are the most valuable, ethical and productive. And, of course, I’ll label and discuss those items that are not so honest, are less than fully ethical, or otherwise seem problematic.

So… stay tuned for some research into… and critical thinking about… “Open.”

-RRD

The Open Learner Patchbook Went To The PressEd Conference

Last month I had the opportunity to let people know about The Open Learner Patchbook via the PressEd Conference. If you want to get your mind stretched open in regards to using WordPress in your pedagogy, check out each of the presentations, which have been curated in to moments here.

The Open Learner Patchbook is a very basic use of WordPress in comparison to the others. But still, I think it’s cool. Here’s my moment:

I was also very happy to get the chance to chat about the Patchbooks at Davidson College last week. (Here are my slides for that one.)

The excellent round of questions that arose from the Davidson talk made me realize that it is high time for the Open Learner Patchbook to have it’s Pressbook version (like the faculty patchbook already has) built so stay tuned for that!

As always, I will be accepting additional patches to both the Open Learner Patchbook and the Open Faculty Patchbook for the rest of time. Let me know if you want to add to it by commenting below or by tweeting at me.

Featured image created by Samantha Pitcher at samanthapitcher.com.

Selling Gen Z on GenEd

Every year, JMU’s more than 80 First Year Advisors have a full day of professional development to prepare for the summer registration of more than 4600 freshmen. This year, I offered some updates about the General Education program followed by these remarks:

I’m often asked by advisors, “How can we talk about the value of JMU’s General Education program in a way that seems persuasive and authentic for this population, Generation Z, at this moment in time?” Yesterday’s IHE featured an op-ed by Roger Ferguson, prez & CEO of TIAA, that got me thinking. Called “Liberal Arts Under Pressure,” it argues for the necessity of a liberal education as part of every single baccalaureate degree.

Ferguson notes the loud, incessant push for more vocationalism in highered, and he acknowledges the practical need to draw clearer connections between college majors and workplace opportunities, but he insists that it’s actually the liberal education portion of a degree that is most useful. “Where does a person learn how to relate to other people? How to communicate a message that’s calibrated for different listeners? How to work collaboratively to solve problems? We learn these things at colleges and universities that offer diverse classes full of diverse people.” His words here are generic—these learning outcomes apply to ALL aspects of life, not just careers.

There’s a tension that applies to first year academic advising: you’re here to help students get started in their chosen major, but you also encourage them to explore, to sample from the banquet of options open to them. Students and parents are very nervous about exploration, however. And they have a right to be nervous: Between 2008-2010 roughly 8.8 million Americans lost their jobs and many jobs didn’t come back after economy rebounded. In my Intro to American Studies class, which attracts freshmen every fall, we discuss the American Dream and how it has changed radically in recent decades. Parents imagine that STEM-y majors will guarantee success, but that’s just not so. Technology is helping to render many jobs obsolete, whether blue collar, white or pink, the kind that once supported a pretty comfortable, middle-class American lifestyle. Here’s some statistics: Out of 10 million new jobs created between May 2012-May 2016, only 5% (541,000) were in computing technology sector. In fact, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the majority of new jobs created were in fields that only indirectly relate to tech fields (what George Anders calls “tech- influenced jobs). If you consult the LinkedIn emerging jobs report for 2018, you’ll see job titles like professional medical representatives, relationship consultants, market analysts, application salespeople, assurance staffers, business support specialists, background investigators, etc.

Books like George Anders’ You Can Do Anything remind us that, despite the prevailing  tech mania (Amazon!), the human touch is more crucial than ever. Anders argues that curiosity, creativity, and empathy may be even more valuable than communicating effectively, thinking analytically, and reasoning quantitatively. And it turns out that curiosity, creativity, and empathy—capacities that define the human condition—are just what Gen Z has.

That observation struck me while reading some infographics about Gen Z compiled by Vision Critical, a marketing firm. And yeah, I know it’s a marketing firm, but in important ways we are “marketing” to the first years already, trying to sell them on the value of our program, so why not learn from experts?

Some highlights about Gen Z:

  • They use their smartphones more than any other device–more than 15+ hours weekly.
  • They especially respond to video storytelling formats; Youtube is their preferred social media platform, where they spend an average of two hours per day. They also prefer Snapchat and Insta over FB and LinkedIn.
  • They have an 8 second attention span! So if you want to grab their interest and hold it, be quick.
  • They are entrepreneurial-minded, and sincerely expect to be their own bosses after graduation.
  • They are very idealistic, very global minded; 60% say they want to change society for better.

These are traits we can address when we talk about the value of liberal education. So here’s my pitch to you to make to them.

  • They are global minded. Well, that’s Curiosity. So talk to them about the knowledge of human societies and global cultures that runs throughout the program. Talk to them about the knowledge they need about the physical world we share. (That’s our program’s Cluster two and three, right there.)
  • They are entrepreneurial. That’s Creativity. So talk up the intellectual skills and cultural competencies infused in GenEd, the critical and creative thinking, the problem-solving; the verbal and non verbal communication skills of Cluster one. Connect for them the use of the scientific method, the purpose of rigorous experimentation from Cluster three.
  • They want to be the change. That’s Empathy. So talk about the dispositions or capacities that GenEd cultivates. Civic engagement, how to be a better citizen, from local communities to global, that’s Cluster four. And inclusivity, well, they especially foster that capacity in Cluster five.

Most of all, emphasize the value of learning in an academic context, guided by faculty who are teacher-scholars, experts in their fields. Sure, they will also take online or distance learning or digital courses. But the human connection is why they come to bricks and mortar university. We can leverage that, too. To repeat Ferguson: “Where does a person learn how to relate to other people? . .  . [A]t colleges and universities that offer diverse classes full of diverse people.” We can absolutely reach Gen Z if we understand who they are, what they value. It’s not a hard sell.

Sources:

Christopher Goodman and Steven Mance, “Employment Loss and the 2001-009 Recession.” (April 2011). https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2011/04/art1full.pdf

LinkedIn Emerging Jobs Report, 2018. https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/research/linkedin-2018-emerging-jobs-report#_blank 

Ferguson, “Liberal Arts Under Pressure.” Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/05/06/disadvantages-and-dangers-making-cuts-liberal-arts-opinion 

Matt Kleinschmit, “Generation Z Characteristics: 5 Infographics on the Gen Z Lifestyle.” https://www.visioncritical.com/blog/generation-z-infographics

Gen Z Looks a Lot Like Millenials …. (Jan. 2019). Pew Research Center. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/01/17/generation-z-looks-a-lot-like-millennials-on-key-social-and-political-issues/

The network is the deliverable