A Conceptual Framework?


I participated in OpenLearning17 and am back for OpenLearning18.  Why you ask?  Because I learned enough last year to articulate better questions this year.  Last year, I went in somewhat blind.  (There might be something we can learn as teachers here
about the experience of our students.) This year, I have a much better sense of what’s in store for me and how to get the most out of it.

To prepare for Week 1, I read the excerpts from Doug Englebart, “Augmenting Human Intellect“.  When I’ve read it before, I found it to be powerful but abstract.  This time around, though, I saw it as a conceptual framework for OpenLearning18.  Which is to say, my experience last year helped me understand what Englebart was saying in 1962.  And what Englebart said, has informed me about what we will be doing starting tomorrow.

Image Credit: Alex Handy from Oakland, Nmibia – Dr. Douglas C. Engelbart Uploaded by Edward

OpenLearning18: Course and Metacourse

I’ve been to plenty of doctors in my life, but one stands out, even now, because of the way he narrated the examination. Let’s say I went to him with a sore left knee. The first thing he would do was to palpate the right knee. Luckily, I didn’t interrupt him and say, “Not that knee, doc.” Instead, I waited a second, and in that space I heard him say, “Medicine teaches us to examine the healthy part first, to get a personal baseline with which to compare the diseased part.” Suddenly I learned something important about medicine in addition to learning something (as I eventually did) about how to ease the pain in my left knee. That small moment of meta made all the difference. It gave me a framework with which to understand everything from medical education to ways in which I could better monitor my own health and better practice my self-care.

I haven’t been to nearly so many attorneys in my life as I have physicians, probably because lawyers do not administer vaccinations (though they may help one negotiate immunity in certain instances–sorry, I just couldn’t resist). Nevertheless, one attorney in recent experience stands out because of a remark he made in a long-ish answer to a very short question. I simply needed a yes or no–or so I thought. When I got the somewhat longer answer, however, I realized that in fact I needed more than the yes or no I was looking for … but that realization involved waiting for the answer, thinking about it, and doing my best to grok it. When I thanked the attorney for the fuller answer, he replied that he typically declined to give yes or no answers even to simple questions, because the fuller context not only helped the client to understand the answer but also helped the client understand his, the attorney’s, reasoning. (It probably didn’t hurt that this attorney had a B.A. in philosophy from Berkeley, either.)

You can probably see where I’m going with these stories in relation to Open Learning ’18. It is true that the course is arranged topically, with single aspects or subsets of “open” discussed most weeks during the cMOOC. Nothing wrong with that, certainly. And I suppose there’s nothing wrong with folks parachuting in for the one week they’re most interested in. But the best part of the course, and one we focus on this week as our introduction, is the opportunity to consider “all the opens, connected.” This bigger picture, this meta-view, is where information becomes knowledge–and where our shared learning experience may also foster wisdom.

Ideally, we’ll emerge with a few powerful conceptual frameworks that help us make sense not only of “all the opens” out there right now, but all the opens that may emerge as we continue to experience the uncanny, sometimes liberatory, sometimes frightening aspects of the global, light-speed telecommunications network we call the Internet. That sense-making can then be fed back into the network in a truly virtuous cycle–a virtuous cycle that’s part of the optimism and energy within Open Learning ’17, Open Learning ’18, and beyond.

I hope this first week helps to make visible the crucial importance of this meta-perspective. We’ll touch on this meta-perspective throughout Open Learning ’18. And we’ll revisit it, full-on, when we get to the final week’s topic of Open Faculty Development.

Bonus for those who read to the end: a primary inspiration for this post is “The Why of Cooking,” an article that appeared last year in The Atlantic. In this wonderful essay I also learned of the extraordinary metacookbook called Salt, Fat, Acid, Heat. In both cases, the analogies with Open Learning ’18 were irresistble, and yummy. For example, from “The Why of Cooking”:

I was … surprised, after roughly a year of searching, to find that there are very few books that concisely articulate the concepts that underlie good cooking, in a way that neither patronizes nor overwhelms. One might call what I was looking for “a metacookbook”—a book not about a certain cuisine or style of cooking, but about cooking itself—and I found good ones to be surprisingly rare.

So welcome to Open Learning ’18, course and metacourse, cMOOC and meta-cMOOC. And welcome to the feast!

Cooking Class

Photo by Patrick Mueller CC-BY 2.0

Week 1: All The Opens!

Welcome. We Are Open
Photo by Alan Levine

Days 1-2: Intro to Open

“ 50 Shades of Open” by Jeffrey Pomerantz and Robin Peek

Days 2-3: Intro to Open

“Openness as Social Praxis” by Matthew Longshore Smith and Ruhiya Seward (a response to “50 Shades of Open”)

OR

“Open Educational Resources and Rhetorical Paradox…” by Nora Almeida (discusses what OERs mean in various contexts)

Day 4: A Chat with Jeffrey Pomerantz, co-author of “50 Shades of Open”

View a video chat with Gardner Campbell and Jeffrey Pomerantz

Day 5: Blogging 

Opportunity to blog about readings for the week

Guiding question: How do this week’s materials relate to your own ideas about open education?


Post by Stephanie Blackmon (director of this week)
Edited for the hub by Hub Director Gardner Campbell

Open for Blogging: Greetings, #openlearning18

There is a certain genre of blog post that is an apologetic acknowledgement of a lengthy lapse in blogging activity, coupled with a hopeful if perhaps uncertain commitment to “do better” going forward. So here you go … “bless me reader, for I have sinned, it’s been about nine months since my last blog post.”

I’m glad #openlearning18 is up and running and nudging me to write here again, in this place that I started for #openlearning17. And I’m doing so from a new place and position, as Director of Academic Technology and the Digital Liberal Arts Collaborative (DLAC) at Grinnell College, a small liberal arts college about an hour east of Des Moines, Iowa. Last year at this time I was at Austin College as a academic technologist, but the funding for the position came to an end last summer. I started the position at Grinnell on September 11, so these last few months have been occupied with transition and new beginnings. Getting the blog started again is one of those new beginnings that I’m excited about, especially as one of my roles at the college is precisely to encourage students and faculty to start up their own blog engines.

What do I hope to gain from #openlearning18? Are you asking about learning outcomes? (just kidding, Gardner). I hope to continue being part of a growing network of learners interested in promoting digital literacies and open practices in higher ed, so (re)connecting with old colleagues and new is a big part of it for me. Getting that nudge back into blogging is an incentive as well. In fact, I’m doubling up on social accountability here, as I’m writing this post at a Friday afternoon collaborative work session with a group of students here at Grinnell who are part of our Vivero Digital Scholarship Fellows program. We have what amounts to a co-working space every Friday afternoon. I think I’m more committed to getting my post written here than I would be by myself in my office.

I’m also hoping to learn more about this “faculty collaborative” model of faculty development to inform our programs at Grinnell. Now that I’m getting a bit more settled in here, we’re starting to think on a longer-term scale about what we want the digital liberal arts to look like at Grinnell. I think that vision will at a minimum involve three components—a framework for articulating desired student digital competencies and literacies (along the lines of the model developed at Bryn Mawr); the development of a digital portfolio practice and culture; and, supporting both of those, a more robust version of Domain of One’s Own. We currently have a web-hosting arrangement with Reclaim Hosting but, oddly, this is generally available only to faculty and not to students.

What do I hope to contribute to #openlearning18? Well, I hope to be a supportive colleague and friend, a good “node in the network,” and an active participant in the group. Maybe I can add some helpful resources and links to the mix and offer some perspective from where I stand. The great thing about these kind of networked opportunities is that you usually can’t predict in advance what you will learn or contribute. So I’m looking forward to unexpected joys and discoveries!

I have to add that is was really fun to meet (most of) the directors of #openlearning recently as they presented at the Educause Learning Initiative conference in New Orleans. Their session got me all excited again for what #openlearning17 was and what #openlearning18 will be. As Gardner Campbell said there,

So in that spirit, I’m glad to once again be a part of this network. Let’s deliver!

Looking Forward

This week for Open Learning ’18,  I’m to expound on these two questions…

  • What do you hope to get from Open Learning ’18?
  • What do you hope to contribute to Open Learning ’18?

Well shoot, if I knew that I probably wouldn’t be here.  Okay… breathe…  Just be honest…

What do I want to “get” from OL18?  Well… everything.  Am I asking too much? Of course I am, but it’s what I want.

I have found myself in a unique situation on my current campus.  I’m leading the Open Education Task Force for the administration and trying to generate discussion to see where we want to go as a campus.  While I know the basics of OER and how it functions, I have no real experience with it beyond my own teaching where I have “borrowed” ideas, activities, and in class materials for my own use.  I have had the great pleasure to work with some fabulous people who were always willing to collaborate and talk though how they did things so peers could benefit and adapt their idea for their own use.  When I started this is what you did as a good colleague, but I don’t think any of us saw it as OER, although essentially it was, it’s just moved online.  I know nothing about how librarians fit in, how web components fit in, how to generate excitement for OER, or how to garner support.  I’m essentially hoping to get some great ideas I can take forward on my campus in an area where I feel inept.

Contribution?  LOTS of questions.  I essentially feel brand new to this and I have quite a bit to learn.  I want to be effective on my campus, but I need more information, guidance, and expertise to feel comfortable in this arena.  So I’m going to be leaning on the MOOC to help me learn.  What I will give you, is a new voice to question how you got to where you are, what is good or bad about OER, and general inquisitiveness about anything you bring up.  I’m looking forward to the discussion.

Atlanta Zoo: Lizard in log
Uh huh, and how do you feel about that?

What I’m Looking Forward To in Open Learning ’18

Hi everyone,

By participating in Open Learning 2018, I guess I have two major goals.  One:  To learn more about the overall trends, forces, and possibilities surrounding the OER movement,  Two: To learn creative strategies for promoting the active use of OER at my particular institution.

I’m lucky enough to work with Steve Greenlaw (who is teaching Week 5), so I hope to leverage is campus gravitas to persuade others to get involved in using OER materials in the classroom.

As a contributor to Open Learning 2018?  That’s a tougher question to answer because I see myself as a novice with a lot to learn.

What I Want to Learn: #OpenLearning18

pexels-photo-461049.jpeg

 

”Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember.  Involve me and I learn.”

– Ben Franklin
 

I am excited to be involved with #OpenLearning18 because it offers the experience of sharing ideas with likeminded individuals who are interested in improving learning. What I want to know is how others are incorporating both the concept of open learning, as well as the tools of open learning, into their work.  I want to know how others think open learning will (or could) impact education at all levels.

What I hope to contribute to #OpenLearning18 is a willingness to share, participate and ask questions (sorry, I am a novice!)  I hope to encourage, and to be encouraged, to find new ways of applying the concept of open learning to improve my teaching and promote sharing among colleagues.  I am looking forward to this experience with all of you!

-Sherry

EdTech Nomad 2018-02-09 15:27:07

 

wormhole-2514312_1920

Photo from Pixabay

What am I looking forward to for OpenLearning18? Connections and conversations! These OpenLearning experiences are designed for network expansion, so participants can connect with each other and see their networks expand (Twitter followers, synched blogs and such). The connections provide opportunities to engage in critical conversations about open education: open in what way, open for whom, what are the benefits, what are the challenges, what are the implications, etc. These conversations can lead to more thoughtful engagement with and implementation of open educational resources (and open learning practices). I am looking forward to continuing to facilitate and participate in those exchanges!

 

The network is the deliverable