All posts by @GoogleGuacamole

Selfies & avatars as a form of reflection

Recently, I’ve spent much time and energy  discussing the pedagogical merits of blogging: a practice that supports skills such as social networking; providing and receiving feedback; developing a sense of audience; and creating a searchable, filterable, organizable record of thinking and growth over time. Alan Levine talks about this last benefit all the time – he can trace his learning for decades through his blog.  That’s wicked cool.

I’ve been blogging for about 5 years. It’s really interesting to look at how my practice has changed over time.  I had some better stories back then, but I’m better at telling them now. More balanced. I’m growing into my blogging and it shows.

However, a couple of nights ago I was searching through old folders on my PC. I was looking for an image that I needed to edit and submit for an upcoming publication. While I was searching (and cursing my lack of organization in the last days of my dissertation phase) I happened across a folder of old avatar pics, some of them as many as five or six years old.  My doctoral program was full of opportunities to establish a digital presence. Blogging, tweeting, and Google Plus were required in one class or another, LinkedIn was often encouraged by the faculty, Skype came in handy, and Instagram wasn’t much of a stretch. Furthermore, I presented at plenty of professional conferences and was interviewed for articles.. all of these required pictures or avatars.

Oh, the avatars. The selfies.

Selfies are somewhat controversial among the general population.  Some people have embraced them as opportunities to document, empower, or entertain.  Others see them as an alarming trend towards collective narcissism and self-involvement.  Since I tend to be the photographer of the family, I see them as the only real visual record of my existence in this world (seriously – and I’m not the only one with this problem).

When I look through the avatar folder, I see my graduate school story unfold as clearly as it does in this blog.  In fact, flipping through selfies might be a more visceral experience than clicking through blog posts, because the pictures were taken in a moment rather than composed over hours, days, or weeks.  When I look at these pictures, I see more than age changes (although there are plenty of those). I see a growing understanding of social media (that first picture on LinkedIn? really? I was a hot mess). I see signs belonging within academic communities (the Howard Rheingold impression). I see confidence in a professional role (never been more in my element than in that picture with my glasses on the top of my head). I see landmark occasions (graduation). I see my kids. I see some pretty significant depression this summer (the third and second to last pictures… I wince a little when I see them and recovery (what a difference a couple months can make).  I see me. The avatars help me lay it all out. They aren’t about self-absorption as much as sharing and recording, just like blogging.

userpic_4297251_54c1303e5deb34a3217a13e04e60fa5d
LinkedIn – 2012.
photo-3
Twitter – 2012.
photo-4
LinkedIn – 2013.
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-17-09-pm
WordPress – 2013
userpic_4297251_9c9e64d049c3492dbb9a63f0c8e514a6
Academia.edu – 2014
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-13-11-pm
Twitter -2014/15
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-13-01-pm
Conferences, Articles – 2015
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-08-57-pm
Instagram – 2015
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-08-44-pm
Twitter – 2015
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-08-36-pm
Twitter – 2015
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-13-26-pm
Google, Presentations – 2016
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-07-54-pm
Twitter – 2016 (Graduation)
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-07-02-pm
Twitter – 2016
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-06-36-pm
Twitter – 2016
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-06-05-pm
Instagram – 2016
screen-shot-2016-10-06-at-10-05-33-pm
Twitter – Today (Literally).

 

Coding and the Adult Learner

I have done a significant amount of coursework in adult learning. I’ve read the canon. I’ve taught classes to other educators on adult learning.  I’ve published a chapter.

Furthermore, I’ve been accused of being an adult learner. In the first year of my doctoral program, a random faculty member stopped me in the hallway to shake me by the shoulders and say emphatically: “YOU (shake) are the ultimate adult learner! WE (shake) are WATCHING (shake) your EVERY MOVE (shake shake). I can’t WAIT to see WHAT YOU DO (shhhhaaakkkkeeeee)!”

So, I am an adult educator and learner, blah blah blah. When I tweeted this today –

it had special meaning to me, but it was not intended to be particularly insightful to the casual reader. Every adult educator knows that adults learn better with ‘just in time’ learning and in ‘need to know’ situations. At some level, most adults have to want to learn what they are learning, they have to need to learn whatever it is that they are learning, or they aren’t learning it. Period.

Granted, I’ve never been the average adult. I tend to be curious about everything and capable of learning a lot…well…almost everything.  I’ll start learning something before I’m actually legitimately interested in it and without particular need (at least what the average adult would designate as need).  That being said, I have a profoundly big blind spot in terms of computer programming and auto repair.

Before I go on, I acknowledge that these are exceedingly useful areas of study, particularly for a woman who hangs out in EdTech circles and who does, in fact, drive automobiles.  I also acknowledge that I’ve had ample opportunity to learn a little about both.  When I was working as a graduate fellow at ALT Lab, there were people eager to teach JavaScript and similar. They literally came to my office door offering to teach me. Also my husband fixes cars for fun. He knows how to make my car horn blow by pushing a button on a laptop. If I wanted a lesson in basic auto repair all I had (have) to do is open the kitchen door and go outside.

Unfortunately, I have actively and repeatedly turned down invitations to learn anything related to coding and auto repair.  Other than how to change my font size in html, I know (actually, now that should be ‘knew’) nothing.

I’ve spent significant time reflecting on my unusual and striking lack of interest.  There’s some deeply ingrained gender bias-type things involved that I’m not sure I’ve fully unpacked, even now. Computers and cars don’t play a role in how I see myself, my work, my past experience, or future goals.  Also, I’ve always been in situations where the potential  teachers are men…the lack of female role models hasn’t helped whatever gender things are going on in my head.  In related news, I hate being wrong in front of anyone, but particularly men (it goes back to my medical days where I worked alone in environments of blatant and not-so-blatant sexual harassment and sexism) and when you mix all this together, I have to say it:

I am Laura Gogia MD PhD, and I am intimidated by networked computers and servers and mainframes and software installation and people who know what these things are. Also cars and mechanics, but that’s a different blog post.

About a month ago I was told I would be learning how to code for my job. It was really quite unexpected. In fact, if I had known I would need to learn these things there’s a decent chance I might have turned the job down or not applied for it in the first place, because  of the bolded statement I just made.

QUERY: Having to learn things unexpectedly is the norm for my work.  I’m good at it.  So how come coding felt so different?

ANSWER: This is the first time ever that I have very real, deeply-held personal barriers to what it was I was being asked to learn.

Learning to code has been a pain in the ass. I have been angry – really angry – at myself, at my current the situation, at my previous education, at my previous workplaces. My anger has been exacerbated by and exacerbating for the grief I felt over moving beyond my phd. I have been depressed – really depressed. I have wanted to give up and walk away.

I am willing to bet that this is the way many adults feel when they try to learn something new, particularly when they are told they have to learn it for work.  Finally, I am getting a taste of what it’s like to be a real everyday adult learner.  

I tend to get emotional about things, but I also always have a strategy.  Like I said, I know the adult ed literature.  I know that motivation is everything, so I grabbed onto every personal reason to learn coding that I could find: keep my job, develop a skillset for the resume, be a model for my kids, develop my brain in new and interesting ways.  The reason didn’t matter, as long as it worked in the moment.

I also knew that expertise begets interest begets expertise. The better I get at something, the more interesting it becomes, the more internally motivated I am, the better I will get. Just. Keep. Working. Things. Will. Happen. It’s my mantra for everything.  Most of the time it works.

This time, it’s working. I’m going to be fine.

But what else is important? The teacher.  To have someone you can trust, who gives a little space for you to be angry or depressed or frustrated or wrong or just plain weird – this is important. So big collective thanks to all the teachers out there who make this happen for adult learners everyday.  You are really important too. Good job.  And thank you.

 

 

 

Reflections on (Im)perfection

When I talk about blogging with students (or faculty) who are just starting to blog, someone almost always asks “how do I know what’s good enough to share?”

It’s a great question. I ask it of myself almost every single time I sit down to write a post. It seems to me that the question reveals two separate but related types of uncertainty:

  1. “What if I’m wrong?”
  2. “What if my audience doesn’t like it?”

This post is about the first uncertainty: the fear of being wrong or otherwise imperfect.

Despite all the educational texts and scholars who reassure us that we learn through mistakes and grow through conflict, I have a major, lifelong problem with a fear of being imperfect. For what it’s worth medical training does not help those with natural tendencies; in fact, it makes it much worse.  Learning in the open, specifically blogging, has been one way for me to hack away at the conditioning just a bit.

I blog, therefore I reveal my imperfections.  Often.  In public.

This morning Lee Skallerup and I spoke with Ken Bauer’s class on digital identity, just like I threatened to in my last post.  Lee was great.  I was absolutely horrible.   I couldn’t make eye contact with the camera to save my life.  I know this because I watched the video later this afternoon.  It was a distracting amount of a lack of eye contact. It was subpar. It was definitely imperfect.

My impulse, of course, was to rip myself to shreds. I had a parent’s night at my daughter’s school tonight.  My husband stayed home to watch the kids  and as I drove alone  to the school I started the ritualistic self-pugilism.  It may sound overly dramatic to call it self-pugilism but no – no one will ever be as hard on Laura Gogia as I am on myself.

However, as I pulled up to the school I said to myself: You’ve had a migraine for the last four days. You still have a migraine. Your head hurts like hell. You’re exhausted and ragged and you didn’t do great today but don’t you think it’s time you gave yourself a break?

Giving yourself a break.  It’s impossible under some circumstances to do your best, let alone be perfect.  Everyone deserves a break, even you.  Even me.

Perfection comes through practice – from trying and failing and picking yourself up and trying again.  I didn’t do great today but I could learn from the effort.  Migraine or no, I’ve gotten into a bad habit of not making eye contact with the camera during video conferences.  Friends have been mentioning it since April.  It’s a lazy move – I’m an introvert. I write better than I speak, and when I have to think and speak at the same time it’s easier for me to focus (or maybe I just enjoy it more) if I crawl back into myself and pretend no one else is there. I talked it over with my family (I showed them parts of the video) and we decided that I should tape a picture of them next to the camera lens and talk to that the next time I do a video conference – for a little while, just to get me back into the habit of actually TRYING to present well.

There’s a meaning to this brief, rough blog post – because, like I said today, I never hit the publish button unless I think at least one person out there might find something in it useful. I (you) can get better, but first comes

  1. screwing up
  2. giving my(your)self a break when I (you) screw up.
  3. take what I (you) can from the experience and strategize.
  4. get better.

We all have to learn that.  Blog to find out how to blog. Only then will you know what’s worth sharing.

 

Digital Presence: A Scheduled Chat with Ken Bauer’s Students

Tomorrow, Lee Skallerup and I will be speaking to Ken Bauer’s #iTec Digital Identity course, a five day bootcamp on digital identity for undergraduate students at Tecnológico de Monterrey on…you guessed it – digital identity.  Ken has put together a stunning lineup – Dave Cormier, Bonnie Stewart, Alan Levine, Amy Burvall, and Autumm Caines – and that’s just on the first half of the week.

I’ve heard all of those people speak expertly on digital identity, to the point that I feel a bit superfluous.  However, in the spirit of not giving into imposter syndrome, I’ve devoted a bit of time to thinking about what I can bring to the conversation that is special and uniquely my own.

I started by brainstorming on Twitter with 5 thoughts on my approach to digital identity and when I started that list, it became clear to me fairly quickly that I had a problem with the title of this course.

 I don’t like to talk about digital identity, because it creates an unnatural divide between digital and other forms of identity.  Digital identity is no different than the multiple identities we carry through the day – e.g. our parenting identity, professional identity, peer identities.

Personally, I’ve been working hard over the last five years to consolidate those identities into a balanced, holistic approach to being an authentic human…so to separate out my ‘digital identity’ and talk about it for minutes on end just doesn’t seem to jibe with the rest of my life mission.

I am myself. I am myself in digital spaces.  I am myself in the grocery store, in my living room, in my work cubicle.  Because my digital experience is so completely integrated into my physical activities, I am my digital self at the very same time that I am waiting in the grocery store line, and in my living room, and in my work cubicle. In fact, I workout early in the mornings to exercise videos stored on my google drive. I can be doing one-legged burpees when I see a Twitter notification pop up in the corner of the screen. Therefore, I am my digital self even as I am very much also my physical self. The distinction is meaningless to me.

I prefer to talk about digital presence.

Presence is closely related to but different from identity.  Identity is who you are; presence is how you behave. How you present yourself.  How you engage with the space and others in it.

Digital presence. All of the speakers Ken has lined up are brilliant on digital presence, but I can speak specifically to what it means to behave as a learner in a digital space.

My primary goal as a blogger and tweeter is to learn.  I am a constructionist at heart; Seymour Papert writes that thinking is made sharper – refined – when it is made concrete. Write a thought down and it becomes less abstract while also becoming something that is available for self reflection and social commentary.  I write to make things concrete.  I write in digital public spaces to gain access to social commentary.

I blog and tweet to create a record. We learn by studying our own trails (and the trails of others).  In 1945, Vannevar Bush called these associative trails. Sure, I could  trace my trails through journals and scrapbooks, but I write in digital, public spaces so that I can have access to hyperlinks, tags, filters, multimodal forms of expression.  I write in these spaces to have access to digital affordances. The ability to rearrange posts and create serendipitous juxtapositions is magical, happy learning.

Finally, I blog and tweet to be a part of something larger than myself.  I have written over and over again on personal learning networks (so has Dave Cormier, probably a little more famously) so I’m not going to belabor the point now.  But as I have said before (and so has Howard Rheingold), the key to learning in and on the open web is making oneself useful. There are different ways to make oneself useful. Being a learner is not just about the cognitive stuff; yes, on Twitter I have been known to help people learn their epistemological frameworks and others have helped me learn to code SQL sequences (all true, documentable stories). However, meaningful learning is often emotional.  It feels scary sometimes.  Isolating.  Confusing. Lonely.  I make myself useful by making myself available in digital spaces.  I help people and they help me as best as we all can, because we are human: humans being humans in digital spaces. 

Digital presence as an opportunity to create, record, and share – that’s what I’m going to talk about tomorrow.